Reality vs. Advertisment

This looks first very amusing and then very disgusting …

Posted in Reality Wash | Leave a comment

21st century organization

I have to confess that until recently I was pretty out-dated in the organization of my private/professional life. I used a Filofax for Calendar and Todo-List and that was it. Forgotten birthdays, late fees for books, last minute working on important stuff – that all happened way to often. What was the problem? I had my Filofax with me most of the time, but I didn’t look into it often enough. I’ve just never made it a habit.

I’m also reading feeds (RSS) and other news very often. I used Feedreader for almost two years. It was working fine as long as I used it at home. But as the one at home doesn’t sync with the one at work, I had problems knowing what to read. Unread news just pilled up and I almost gave up sometimes. When I switched to a Mac at work, I couldn’t even use it any more, so it was time for change. Frankly, I’m not a guy who changes his working environment very often. Probably because I’m not an “Innovator”, but an “Early Adopter/Early Majority” (Diffusion of Innovation). I need to be convinced, that the new thing is better, not that it’s just new. But it was about time I use the opportunities of web-based organizing in my favour.

So the first problem was News-Feeds. A web-based Feedreader would be a solution. I checked out Bloglines, but I didn’t like their reading interface very much. So I tried Google Reader. Much better: slick, minimalistic and a nice way of reading post by just scrolling down. So the problem of feed reading was solved. After using it for a while, I discovered a widget for the Google Personalized Homepage (named iGoogle now).

I had used iGoogle for a while as a startup page at work, showing me the weather and some daily quotes, but not much more. I’ve never thought of using it for more. But a Google Reader widget (a widget is a little page which can be integrated into another web page like iGoogle) changed my mind. Now I could have a browser start page at home and work which would show me my unread news and weather. Now I got interested.

Several days later I realized that I forgot another birthday. Damn you Filofax! Ok, it kinda was my fault, tough. 😉 So I took another step forward in realizing that I need a calendar that I really look into every single day. I did check out Google Calendar, mainly because there already was a widget for iGoogle. It is really nice. I used Ical at work, but I found Google Calendar as nice and easy to use and it’s accessible from everywhere. Not to forget it appears on my start-up page so I have to look at it. Goodbye Filofax!

Next thing which was very important to me was a proper todo-list. Google had some build in widgets for that, but they didn’t satisfy me at all. I need for example priorities. A short search time later I stumbled upon Remember the Milk. It was perfect: priorities, tags, due dates and everything very simple and minimalistic (love that). And of course it had a widget for iGoogle.

The last important thing was blurriness. I mean the kind of little notes about stuff that you always scribble down, always forget and always never use again despite being very useful information. I first used Apple Stickies for that. Nice little notes, but bound to my work mac. Web-based was still the keyword. So came Google Notebook. After a while I realized that it wasn’t really that good. The notes had no titles, the iGoogle widget was hard to navigate. There must be something better out there. So I found Stikkit. These guys did a great job of taking stickies into the 21st century. According to what you type the stikkit realizes if it’s a contact, a check list or an apointment. On the fly. No clicking or selecting from drop downs. Just typing in a list is almost addictive. So I switched.

Now I had a feedreader, a calendar, a todo-list and notes – everything web-based and on my browsers start page. Haven’t forgotten a single birthday since and I finally arrived in the 21st century. 😉

Posted in Mind Wash, Reality Wash, Tech Wash | 1 Comment

Globalisation and Labour

The income of any country (measured as GDP) is divided into income from the three (classic) factors of production: capital, labour and land. Globalisation (free movement of capital and knowledge) makes it easier for any kind of labour (manual or knowledge based) to be performed somewhere else (if it is cheaper there). This of course decreases the income from labour in the country and increases income from capital. Opposing this are the increasing total income of the country because of cheaper imports and higher productivity. The question is, how strong is the effect really?

The IMF took a closer look in it’s recent World Economic Outlook. First, it is clear that the income share of labour is getting smaller. Here is the average annual decrease between 1982 and 2002 (in percentage points):

  • Large Europe (France, Germany, Spain, Italy): -0.33
  • Rest of Europe (excluding Eastern Europe): -0.33
  • Japan: -0.25
  • Anglo-Saxonian (Britan, Australia, Canada, US): -0.05

It hit Europe pretty hard (about 10% less than 20 years ago). But what of this is related to globalisation? Here it is split up for Large Europe:

  • Technology Change: -0.2
  • Labour Globalisation: -0.08
  • Labour-market policies: -0.05

So the technology change almost 2/3 of the total decrease, making it the real source of income share reduction.

What is the conclusion? Given that the annual grow rate of the GDP was significantly higher than the annual decrease in the income share, the total labour income has actually increased. Or as the Economist put it recently: Labour’s share of the pie is smaller, but the whole pie got bigger.

More interesting would be, how the decrease effects skilled and unskilled workers. I will have a look into that a bit later.

Posted in Read Wash, Reality Wash | 3 Comments

the future of input …

http://cs.nyu.edu/~jhan/ftirtouch/index.html

Posted in Tech Wash | Leave a comment

Toleranz, Akzeptanz und Respekt

Jazzadeiros “Plädoyer gegen die Toleranz” spielt Respekt und Toleranz gegeneinander aus und kommt zu einer negativen Grundeinstellung gegen die Toleranz. Das liegt aber meiner Meinung nach an der wertfreien Anwendung des Begriffes.

Was heißt Toleranz nach dem Textbuch? Eine Handlung oder eine Eigenschaft, die sich von den eigenen Handlungen oder Eigenschaften unterscheidet zu dulden. Was man an Handlungen oder Eigenschaften anderer Menschen toleriert, ist nun mal aber von der eigenen ethischen Grundeinstellung abhängig. Ich z.B. bin intolerant gegenüber religiösen Fanatismus (in jeder Form), aber tolerant gegenüber Einwanderung. Eine Aussage wie “Ich bin gegen Intoleranz” ist demnach komplett bedeutungslos und so ist auch ein “Plädoyer gegen die Toleranz” – es fehlt der Kontext in dem diese beiden Wörter Bedeutung annehmen können, das persönliche Gut und Böse, das diesen Wörter leben einhaucht.

Was ist Akzeptanz? Akzeptanz geht über die bloße Duldung hinaus. Man kann etwas ablehnen oder es dulden oder zustimmen. Akzeptanz stellt diese Zustimmung da. Der Unterschied zwischen einem Nachbar der dem neuen ausländischen Nachbarn aus dem Weg geht (Duldung) oder ihn aktiv in die Hausgemeinschaft einbezieht (Zustimmung) ist der Unterschied zwischen Toleranz und Akzeptanz. Der Unterschied ist auch sehr wichtig. Akzeptanz ist nun mal seltener als Toleranz, weil es eine grössere Übereinstimmung mit dem eigenen Werten erfordert.

Wofür steht Respekt? Der Begriff ist ein bisschen flatterhaft. Er kann für simple Höflichkeit stehen. Oder, wie ich ihn gern sehe, als eine höhere Form der Akzeptanz. Wenn Akzeptanz Zustimmung bedeutet, dann ist Respekt Zustimmung plus die persönliche Rücksichtnahme. Toleranz und Akzeptanz sind passiv, erfordern keine aktive Handlung. Respekt bringt man aber entgegen, wenn man seine eigenen Handlungen ändert, um die ethischen Grundsätze des Anderen nicht zu verletzen.

Also nochmal: Toleranz, Akzeptanz und Respekt können an sich niemals negativ oder positiv sein, sonder sind allein von der persönlichen Ethik abhängig. Ob ich Sweatshops oder Bürokratentum toleriere oder nicht toleriere, spricht für meinen Charakter (ich toleriere beides nicht), und nicht für den Charakter der Toleranz.

Posted in Mind Wash, Read Wash | 5 Comments

Trips still on my list

  • New York to New Orleans Road Trip
  • Trans-Siberia Express (from Moscow via Mongolia to Beijing)
  • Seattle and Vancouver
  • LA and back to California
  • Egypt and Israel
  • The Strange Small Caribbean Islands
  • Brasil
  • Iceland
  • The New East EU
  • Paris for a while
  • Ireland Road Trip
  • Mexico

Posted in Travel Wash | Leave a comment

Travel Map, again

It’s about time I update it …

World Map
visited 28 countries (12%)

create your own visited countries map

Posted in Travel Wash | Leave a comment

Killersenf

Nachdem Emsdetten die steinalte Diskussion um Killerspiele mal wieder entfacht hat und es nun in einem Verbotsversuch umschlägt, muss ich schweren Herzens eingestehen:

Auch ich (und ein paar Freunde) habe damals mit 15 meine Schule in einem Killerspiel (DOOM, was für ein schrecklicher Name?!) nachgebaut. Vom exakten Layout bis zur Statue und den Bäumen war alles (mehr oder weniger, technische Möglichkeiten!) perfekt. Wir haben in jeden Klassenraum ein Monster an den Lehrertisch gestellt. Das Lehrerzimmer quoll über vor Monstern. Und dann haben wir Stunden damit verbracht. auf Lehrerjagd zu gehen.

Bitte verhaftet mich. Ich habe es verdient. 😉

Posted in Reality Wash | 1 Comment

Intellectual Fighting

The Wikipedia is known for its Edit Wars, users fighting over content and changing pages quickly back and forth. To honor the most crazy ones, Wikipedia has a web page for it: Lamest Edit Wars

Some of the best:

  • Death Star
    • Is it 120km or 160km in diameter? Who cares?
  • List of numbers that are always odd
    • The number 3 was being considered as possibly being not odd. Page protection was needed to halt the heated debate.

And my absolute favorite one:

  • Lamest edit wars
    • Edit wars over which edit wars are allowed to be on this page, or over how specific entries on this page should be worded (oh, the irony).

Posted in Mind Wash | 1 Comment

Times

The Fox is back!!! 😉

Posted in Mind Wash | 1 Comment